Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis and Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich Analysis

In situations of desperation, desolation or depression humans may become cap competent of acting inexplicably. When a person is faced with a sulky situation he may try to deny the humanity of the situation, and as such remain optimistic that all entrust be set right. The protagonists of Franz Kafkas The Metamorphosis and Alexander Solzhenitsyns One Day in the behavior of Ivan Denisovich must cope with these elements of self-delusions, their bitter wisdom and the fragility of their own hope. mickle who believe they father nonhing to look forward to, begin to replace their perceptions of comfort to cope with their dismal situation. The human Gregor Samsa enjoyed happiness from making new(prenominal)s happy, as seen through his intentions of sending his sister to the musical Conservatory or his magnate to provide for his family. When he is no longer able to find happiness in human interaction, he begins to find happiness for himself in the simplest occurrences. bring also An alysis of Characters in Flannery OConnors The Life You go on May Be Your OwnHe especially exchangeabled dangling from the ceiling it was completely different from lying on the floor wiz could breathe much freely a faint swinging principal went through the body and in the almost happy absent- heededness which Gregor felt up there, it could happen to his own surprise that he let go and plopped onto the floor.During the initial stages of his metamorphosis, Gregor is proud and happy about his ability to provide such a comfortable life for his family. After his transformation he is not able to make others happy consequently universe force-outd to seek joyousness for himself in the smallest things, despite how simple they may seem. Ivan Denisovich, also referred to as Shukhov, finds himself in a similar situation. He is forced to abandon the common goals overlap by other men and to adopt a mentality where choice provides him with satisfaction. Ivan is happy about his day because he avoids additive punishment, has more than ordinary to eat, works at building a wall which he takes pride in and acquires some new tools. His enjoyment of these simple accomplishments demonst order the changes which have occurred inwardly him.Shukhov went to sleep, and he was very happy. Hed had a lot of luck today. They hadnt purge him in the cooler. The gang hadnt been chased out to work in the Socialist company Development. Hed finagled an extra bowl of mush at noon. The boss has gotten them good rates for their work. Hed felt good making that wall. They hadnt found that piece of steel in the frisk. Caesar had paid him off in the evening. Hed bought some tobacco. And hed gotten over that sickness.Nothing had botch up the day and it had been almost happy.The happiness felt by Ivan results from incidents that others would take for granted. His additional labour in the prison is not for any reason other than for his survival and satisfaction. Rather than thinking of how he could be made happier by what he does not have, he appears happy with what he is given. The protagonists of some(prenominal) novels force themselves into believing they are happy, to be collapse able to cope with the grim public of their circumstances.Although there is no rationale given for their respective situations, the protagonists two have the knowledge that their life has changed for the worse. When Gregor reflects upon the life he once gave to his family, he begins to feel guilty about Grete having to care for him. His life has been based upon his character reference as the provider, but fulfilling his duties after the transformation is no longer plausible. much during Gregors short stays in the city the Conservatory would come up in his conversations with his sister, but always merely as a beautiful dream which was not supposed to come dependable, and his parents were not happy to study even these innocent allusions but Gregor had very concrete ideas on the candid a nd he intended solemnly to announce his plan on Christmas Eve.Thoughts like these, completely useless in his present state, went through his head as he stood glued to the door.His motivation has been fulfilling the financial and emotional needs of his family put forth on him, but he is no longer take by his family. The Samsa family is now capable of surviving without his contributions, and seemingly are better people as they become independent. As the bug he is a burden to his family because his purpose in life has been made im thinkable to fulfill. contrasted Gregor, Ivan believes that he has a purpose (to work with his give) but he is futile to because of an unfair conviction.Easy money doesnt weigh anything and it doesnt give you that good skin senses you position when you in truth earn it. The old saying was true-what you dont pay for honestly, you dont derive good value for. Shukhovs hands were sboulder clay good for something. Back habitation hed surely find himself w ork making stoves, or something in the carpentry line, or mending pots and pans.The only catch was- if youd been convicted with vent of civil rights, you couldnt get work anywhere and you werent allowed back family unit.Ivan is proud of the work he does with his hands but he is not permitted to choose his living because of the sentence. He is not able to return home and has lost his civil rights. His future will never exceed his past life. For Ivan true freedom means home but he will never have that freedom again. The manlike prisoners create a society in which they have the security of astute what they will be doing and eating from one day to the next to that extent remain powerless over their futures. The changes caused by the peculiar situations give both protagonists a more pessimistic view of their lives.The promise of hope causes people to be optimistic even in the grimmest of situations, but a deficiency of it may be detrimental. In the case of Gregor the fragility of his hope is a disadvantage. He retains a human sense of frustration, memory and optimism despite his change magnitude animal instincts. During the incident when Grete attempts to remove his furniture he at primary seems passive to the notion but once his mother voices doubts, saying the removal of the furniture would be symbolic of the family bountiful up hope of his return, he too becomes more hopeful, even wanting to give up locomote to retain his humanity.Nothing should be removed everything had to stay he could not do without the beneficial influence of the furniture on his state of mind and if the furniture prevented him from carrying on this senseless crawling around, then that was no loss but rather a great advantage.The hope of others around him greatly influences his own, as instanced when he opens his door to measure the reaction of his family to his initial transformation. later(prenominal) Grete declares the bug would have already left if it really were Gregor. She is essentially giving up the hope that the bug is her brother expectedly Gregor dies that night. The will to live for Ivan, however, is bulletproof enough to overpower his hopelessness and the endless difficulties of a life he cannot control. He has enough hope of getting out of prison to withstand his own sanity, but not so much that he becomes demoralize about his situation.Shukhov sort of liked the way they pointed at him- the lucky qat nearly through with his sentence. But he didnt really believe it. vex the fellows who shouldve been let out in the war. They were all kept in till forty-six- till further notice. And then those with three years whod gotten five more slapped on. They twisted the law any way they wanted. You finished a ten-year blossom forth and they gave you another one. Or if not, they still wouldnt let you go home.But sometimes you got a kind of funny feeling inside. Maybe your number really would come up one day. God, just to think you might whirl out an d go homeIvan realizes that he will never have freedom yet wants nothing more than being released from prison. Restraining his hopes with a apprehension of reality enables him to find a balance between escape and cheer during his sentence. It is difficult to be truly happy when keeping the dismal reality in mind.The protagonists find their lives are worse because they know it is not possible to find the happiness they once had. Despite this knowledge, they maintain the hope of go to normal for as long as they can. This hope serves to protect the potentially false happiness they experience. Both characters are described as being almost happy because, despite their self-delusions, they can only obtain true happiness if their lives were to return to the way they once were but that is unfeasible.