'Police Ethics Essay\r'

'All professions operate at bottom a reliable unspecific simulation of code of morality. These argon rules that goern the birth of a particular group of originals, the channel amongst themselves and around importantly with the rest of the society. some(prenominal) of these codes of moral philosophy whitethorn be law in force(p)y en depositable and their violation whitethorn give-up the ghost to criminal proceedings instituted against the violator. Contravening of the code of honourable motive may alike lead to an idiosyncratic’s name being touch off the professionals’ list like in the typesetters case of auditors, engineers and accountants amongst opposites.\r\n The guard force has its ingest distinct code of morals twain implied and express. It is these ethics that regulate the conduct of on the whole law enforcement ships officers in their daytime to day running of their duties. These ethics may be unique to one state or universal as they atomic number 18 a product of social and political environment. The unite Nations has its own framework of ethics inwardly which the law or law enforcement officers argon supposed to operate. These argon ethics that fool been fine tuned and give the sack be univers exclusivelyy use (United Nations, 1989).\r\n legal philosophy is a broad term used to de none every(prenominal) officers mandated to enforce the law, officers that can make arrests as well as detain a suspect.\r\n It is agreeable that natural law officers argon charged with the delicate duty of maintaining law and order. In the course of maintaining much(prenominal) order, they argon leap off to come across various challenges and impediments that may make them compromise their legal duties. jurisprudence exist in an environment fill up with suspicion and hostility and with the powers they possess; they are promising to intimidate the rest of the citizens. They similarly co nfuse readinessary powers as it is non possible to spell out and bring down in the law how a certain issue is to be sinkled. They are judge to make split decision over who is innocent and who needs to be questioned (Hirst, M.J., 1990).\r\n To stand out these duties, they are governed by professional ethics that guide them when strikeing out their duties. In the process of carrying out these duties, police officers are pass judgment to uphold and protect the gentle rights of the civilians and suspects. This is in conformity to both the issue and international law. Their duty is to safeguard the interests of the globe and assist public officials in the public presentation of their duties. These duties and responsibilities should be carried out in imbibe with the laid procedures. Objectivity and fairness are two key ideals that should be upheld and private interests should not conflict the efficiency in carrying out of such responsibilities.\r\n Key to police ethics is the issue of discrimination. police officers and other law enforcement officers are evaluate to carry out their duties indiscriminately. They are guided by the law and it should not be applied selectively. Gender, race, social and political status, creed or ethnic tailground should not be used as a pedestal to accord somebody harsh or preferential breedment. Almost all professions are expected to uphold confidentiality in their interactions with the public.\r\n patrol officers too are not expected to reveal private exposit not unless it has been established that publicizing such details will help in the flexure of duty, for ex amperele in apprehending a suspect. The procedures and trading operations of the police officers should remain within the forces precincts as the release of such information can lead to jeopardizing of important missions. Every police officer is hence cumber to confidentiality. No data regarding the police should be released to so me other party without proper authorization (Miller, S. et al, 1997.)\r\n patrol officers are expected to use bonny force in carrying out their duties. This just does not extend to malicious defame to property, unwarranted harassment of the pubic and either(prenominal) other measures that are not within the precincts of what is unavoidable in the line of duty. The force applied should not go beyond what is necessary and reasonable in carrying out such kind of an activity. The police ethics are against the subjection of suspected criminals to brutality that is outside the stipulations of the law.\r\n Hierarchy in the police force is legally and ethically emphasized. Orders and commands in the force al musical modes take down(prenominal) route. As long as the orders presumptuousness are lawful and do not contravene the ethics, an officer is under bargain carry them out. The superiors on the other hand are expected to have full responsibility of the acti ons of their juniors in regard to the program line that they have issued. reckons of ethics also do not allow police officers to make gifts that are attached to their work, in case of such an offer; they are expected to notify their superiors.\r\n It is also against police ethics for officers to carry out investigations into issues that they have personal connections with unless such involvement is not probably to have a bearing on the investigations.\r\n Objectivity is to be upheld at all times. As far as suspects are concerned, police ethics require the officers to treat suspects humanely in the knowledge that they are innocent until proven guilty. There should also be enough grounds to admit the arrests of such suspects (Bracey, D.H, 1992).\r\n Like in every other profession, personal feelings and prejudices are bound to get into the way of efficiency and professionalism. practice of law enforcement officers sometimes find themselves in eth ical dilemmas.\r\n There are four classifications of dilemmas; among these discretion and loyalty are the most habitual. Police are allowed discretionary authority in their line of duty. These are powers to choose the most appropriate decision to make in a specific case. This is where personal cognition comes at play and in many a(prenominal) cases lead to selective application of the law. A policeman is supposed to chose who to charge with a certain disgust and who to leave. In make such a decision, personal preferences and prejudices may impede on the process of reservation of the right judgment as inevitable by law. This is a very common dilemma (Blalock, J., 1992.).\r\n Blacks and Hispanic community have been complaining of harassment by the police. The crime rates in the United States are that these two communities have a amply prevalence rate in crime, with such a notion in the back of a policeman mind; an officer is bound to have a overcast judg ment in his view of any person from these communities. With his or her discretionary authority, a police officer is more likely to arrest a black in the midst of whites in case of a fracas more than he would to a white who is amongst blacks.\r\n Personal interests are also likely to stand in the way of executing proper judgments. This is complicated by the temptation to take bribes. It is against police ethics and also against the law for police officers to knock off or accept a bribe.\r\nReferences\r\nHirst, M.J., 1990. set the Standards for Policing: Meeting Community\r\nExpectations, London, Association of school principal Police Officers.\r\nUnited Nations, 1989. United Nations Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement\r\nOfficials, New York\r\nMiller, Seumas, Blackler, John, & Alexandra, Andrew, 1997. Police Ethics, Sydney: Allen & Unwin..\r\nBlalock, J., 1992. Mismanagement and Corruption. Police Studies 15(4).\r\nBracey, D.H, 1992. Police Corruption and Commun ity relations: Community Policing. Police Studies 15(4).\r\n'